From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Mar 12 12:30:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.coastsight.com (ns1.coastsight.com [208.46.230.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919D937B75C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:30:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maillist@coastsight.com)
Received: from ns1.coastsight.com ([208.46.230.17])
	by ns1.coastsight.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 14cgS4-0009Cj-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:30:28 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:30:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Rick Duvall <maillist@coastsight.com>
To: Dave VanAuken <dave@hawk-systems.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: FreeVSD for FreeBSD?
In-Reply-To: <DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNKEJNECAA.dave@hawk-systems.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103122028150.34932-100000@ns1.coastsight.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This makes alot of sense to me!  Why reinvent the wheel?

I have been researching jail, but am disgusted that I have to re-compile
the jails as well after upgrading FreeBSD so that the jails will
update.  Seems like a hassle to me.  Also, compiling doesn't always work
when making jails.  Jails also take up alot of disk space in comparison to
normal virtual hosting solution.  I do, however, like the flexibility of
jail, but don't know of any exploits in Jail, or in FreeVSD for that
matter.

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dave VanAuken wrote:

> have looked at (and developed a few solutions using) jail, but in
> short, am hoping to trade development time for ready made application
> that just requires tweaking/manipulating for comfort, rather than
> continuing with the solution development and the associated
> troubleshooting and such.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Duvall [mailto:maillist@coastsight.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:50 PM
> To: Dave VanAuken
> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: FreeVSD for FreeBSD?
> 
> 
> FreeVSD sounds alot like jail (see man jail in 4.x).  I am wondering
> what
> the difference is, and if FreeVSD uses less or more system
> resources...
> 
> Any input on this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dave VanAuken wrote:
> 
> > have not looked into this too deeply:
> >
> > reference link:
> > 	FreeVSD - http://www.freevsd.org
> >
> > Two questions:
> >
> > 1) anyone tried running FreeVSD on FreeBSD using linux compat?
> >    - feedback?
> >
> > 2) anyone aware of similar projects or products specifically for
> > FreeeBSD?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message