From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:55:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCAE16A4CF for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:55:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CA443D48 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:55:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8RJwkcG009662; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:46 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i8RJwkfa009661; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:46 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:45 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Mike Makonnen Message-ID: <20040927195845.GC1016@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20040926160418.GB22015@rogue.acs.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040926160418.GB22015@rogue.acs.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing the FreeBSD keyword X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:55:19 -0000 --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 07:04:18PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote: > Hi folks, >=20 > I would like to remove the requirement that an rc.d script have > a FreeBSD keyword. Since it's pretty clear that NetBSD and FreeBSD > aren't going to share scripts the reason for the requirement no longer > exists. If we can agree on this I would like to MFC it to RELENG_5. > If it doesn't get MFCed it must be there for the entire 5.x life-cycle > (which seems pretty stupid for something without any benefits). >=20 > Getting rid of the requirement will also allow us to more easily > implement what people have been asking for, for some time now: > manipulating a group of related services. All those mergemaster runs are going to hurt, but I think it's a good idea. -- Brooks --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBWHD1XY6L6fI4GtQRAg8aAKCsOzEZMGz3HzLhFPz1GRiRpja4lgCgzjIc PGacpc7TsFhueaN1kR5y7OY= =7IES -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C--