From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 21 11:41:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE014D00 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA05382 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199907211840.LAA05382@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Base Kerberos 5 support? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:40:31 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Howdy , I noticed this : http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/server/Deploy/security/MitKerb.asp Microsoft claims that they are going to be compatible with MIT Kerberos 5 or so the story goes 8) I noticed that the based kerberized tools in FreeBSD are for Kerberos IV... I installed Kerberos 5 port on my system and it appears to work except in multi-homed server: I get replay dispatch errors ... My work around was simply to start moving my network services to a a box which I don't use often and it has a single interface which is okay and right for internal network services such as kerberos . Cheers -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message