From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 22 23:18:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D9C1065670; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87DB8FC14; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxa40 with SMTP id 40so2362vxa.13 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:18:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AR12SzanJmgMEOHyAvqFL2klCRHroeu0n108t/q+iUg=; b=BvhaQLbmB2wgHiinbWoxbmXUZslRP+yJqZ47vHia0+mSycPyEQbp3wmoFM+N3Lb6pf bNKQy/wlOGj12cFsfhLFlFyVHNSIYUNyL4ONFQQSw3lDMdVGREgebf6yDkxo9G3OQjvk AQFFk1/2VrSYtojshsExFHHAKSoxfAmyQFBJQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WxORZm3wISLBLDN8M6BGhFy9VPE8+CQBxCFPER0ClFvk+zEGEG/ht9U3VNmfWs7b91 9um00ZAJ8QMjUHLD7iJer7542iH4c+Zp7ZSGfQXC3PKNJ1n02BntNe+0urGGr6FRU5J1 aJDFHZHabWioa43KX6HsOk0KO8MmtLz+C79uU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.96.202 with SMTP id i10mr652847vcn.191.1295738294979; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.198.203 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:18:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:18:14 +0800 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Ian FREISLICH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:18:16 -0000 On 23 January 2011 02:28, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd >> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets >> would test this out and get back to me. > > Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now. =A0This I do > know however: at boot, it associates much much faster. =A0I used to > have to wait at least 10 seconds for "the default route interface". > Now, association and DHCP blazes through without pausing. Can you please verify this? Would you please let me know which version of the OS you were running before this? I haven't changed anything on the AR9285 codebase that would account for the above. Something to keep in mind with the AR9280/AR9285 support is that I've seen it be -very- unpredictable - sometimes it's reliable off the bat, sometimes it's not. You have to repeat it a few times to verify that you've actually seen a change. Thanks, Adrian