From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:48:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD0C16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D6443D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rionda@gufi.org) Received: from kaiser.sig11.org (80.182.47.232) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.0.019) id 3FE032C1004BBE12 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:48:26 +0100 Received: by kaiser.sig11.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B609527; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:48:25 +0100 (CET) From: Matteo Riondato To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040114003443.260c6738@piglet.goo> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <1073998390.18384.19.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114001137.5ce8983b@piglet.goo> <1074000332.18384.43.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114003443.260c6738@piglet.goo> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5DTkAOVK/1xyh1q0EX30" Message-Id: <1074001705.18384.58.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:48:25 +0100 Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rionda@gufi.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:48:29 -0000 --=-5DTkAOVK/1xyh1q0EX30 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il Mar, 2004-01-13 alle 14:34, Tig ha scritto: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:25:33 +0100 > Matteo Riondato wrote: > >=20 > > I'm sorry but I cannot understand your point=20 >=20 > My point was you do not need to understand 'everything' to write a > report. You just need to record what is going on, with enough > information for people to see who is doing what and where. Yes, that can be true, but what if i cannot understand _anything_ about=20 VM or IPsec development ? I have to ask the developer. And what about projects that are not in the tree such as KGI? I have to ask the developer about the status of his project. So writing a status report becomes a work of both users and developers. Writing a status report doesn't mean only "write about the state of the project as it is now" but also "write about what's going to change in the project in the next 2-3 months" and this is something that developers know but normal current users ignore, although they can give suggestions about what they would like to see in the system and they can send patches to see what-they-would-like-to-see-in-the-system been included in the system. (I hope I made myself understandable). I'll be glad to help writing the Status Report, if someone else help me :) Regards --=20 Rionda aka Matteo Riondato G.U.F.I Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) BSD-FAQ-it Main Developer (http://www.gufi.org/~rionda) GPG key at: http://www.riondabsd.net/riondagpg.asc Sent from: kaiser.sig11.org running FreeBSD-5.2-CURRENT --=-5DTkAOVK/1xyh1q0EX30 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAA/cp2Mp4pR7Fa+wRAjiSAKCxJpDzDBpFUUxWi+nSnh/3Vwfg/QCguEgV EDYh6xTqBsNXMmcmdX4MIzE= =UvDG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5DTkAOVK/1xyh1q0EX30--