Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:46:12 +0800 From: Buganini <buganini@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: jasonh@dataix.net Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" Message-ID: <e5b1e8d40908052146p1fc07520l697f9262f21ed7d5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7fX59uGuf0@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk> <c/bsZ0e9iU@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <4A747C77.1040800@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090801224323.GA65040@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4A7552C8.7020508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4A75A813.10307@infracaninophile.co.uk> <7d6fde3d0908030148h3b5a5934lb0ade13d8b095105@mail.gmail.com> <4A7724A7.6000500@FreeBSD.org> <7fX59uGuf0@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Recently I'm think about how to make ports easier to upgraded: 1) Add a NODE_VERSION in each ports' Makefile, this variable would be stored in +CONTENTS. 2) Add a volatile-meaning flag in description of dependencies When a port, A, whose NODE_VERSION in Makefile > NODE_VERSION in +CONTENTS, ports that volatile'ly depends on A would be rebuilt. Any comment is welcome --Buganini
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e5b1e8d40908052146p1fc07520l697f9262f21ed7d5>