From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 19 12: 1:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ra.eng.mindspring.net (ra.eng.mindspring.net [207.69.192.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C60137B408 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sudish@mindspring.com) Received: (qmail 4026 invoked by uid 52477); 19 Jul 2001 19:01:12 -0000 To: Cc: John Baldwin , Terry Lambert , , Subject: Re: x86 unaligned access followup. References: <20010719113955.H50024-100000@wonky.feral.com> From: Sudish Joseph Date: 19 Jul 2001 15:01:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20010719113955.H50024-100000@wonky.feral.com> (Matthew Jacob's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:41:20 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.2 (Hera) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Jacob writes: > Actually, to be fair, we'd have to consider all the kernel subsystems that > have *not* in fact been tested on alpha. The dozens of warnings from NetGraph > or CODA code indicate that there might be problems there, for instance. NetGraph certainly has some 32-bit asssumptions embedded in it that actively break on an Alpha. See kern/27767. -- Sudish Joseph To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message