From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 07:43:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F72AAE for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quix.smartspb.net (quix.smartspb.net [217.119.16.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E995E28BF for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 07:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dyr.smartspb.net ([217.119.16.26] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by quix.smartspb.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Wpv3O-00065Y-GL; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:47:10 +0400 Message-ID: <5386E4F6.1000001@smartspb.net> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:42:46 +0400 From: Dennis Yusupoff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Yuan , FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: propose a new generic purpose rule option for ipfw References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140528-1, 28.05.2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 07:43:00 -0000 Looks very similar to ng_bpf + ipfw ngtee, isn't it? 29.05.2014 11:25, Bill Yuan пишет: > It is a really powerful thing in my opinion. but it has requirement, > to master it requires the knowledge of the structure of the > packet/frame/whatever. Anyone like this feature? Like it ? please > voice out. -- Best regards, Dennis Yusupoff, network engineer of Smart-Telecom ISP Russia, Saint-Petersburg