Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:15:51 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice requires libc_r? Message-ID: <20040330181551.GB25571@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040330.231421.424247612.chat95@mac.com> References: <20040328175306.GA12134@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040330.093324.846939848.chat95@mac.com> <20040330003717.GA19883@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040330.231421.424247612.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 11:14:21PM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <20040330003717.GA19883@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I think the problem starts with lang/gcc32. In gcc/collect2.c > > one finds libc_r is hardcoded. I'm not sure if I can just > > wired. should be fixed. I tried the simple solution of s/libc_r/libpthread. I got the compiler built, but "make check" appears to hang in garbage collector test. > > change those references to libpthread. I'll play around somemore, > > but right now it does not look good for OOo and libpthread. > > Hm, situation seems to be complicated. gcc-3.3 came with FreeBSD 5.2.1 > doesn't produce runnable OOo 1.1.1 since signal handler is > somewhat odd. yes, really odd. while gcc 3.3 compiles OOo *1.1.0* happly. > > if your 5-current's gcc is newer than mine, > > % gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 > > please try systems's compiler instead. > No, we have the same system compiler, and I re-installed my world on Saturday. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330181551.GB25571>