Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:45:13 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> Cc: Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org>, Giuseppe Lettieri <g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: cxgbe's native netmap support broken since r307394 Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomPW7%2BknAKbaLYjKXfgd=xAH3bYZi_LoxtNf5cuejJeJw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B_eA9iUOZ9JLyx3bbDUZVc=cR6SqxReoOLRHUYQy-BU6Eb-UQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20161217222812.GA4979@ox> <CA%2B_eA9jxs3FatSLs8fseb%2BJSrqWrYkegDHyKA1q2QH=Q4_LbJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFoGT9VoRWF306gBYgSKd2wi1rx3_2-yLpnxO98GyM0V-0Xog@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B_eA9iUOZ9JLyx3bbDUZVc=cR6SqxReoOLRHUYQy-BU6Eb-UQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, What's the commit? We should get it into -HEAD asap. -adrian On 20 December 2016 at 01:25, Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, applied to the netmap github repo. > This fix will be published when Luigi does the next commit on FreeBSD. > > Cheers, > Vincenzo > > 2016-12-19 20:05 GMT+01:00 Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>: >> IFNET_RLOCK will work, thanks. >> >> Navdeep >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Navdeep, >>> >>> Indeed, we have reviewed the code, and we think it is ok to >>> implement nm_os_ifnet_lock() with IFNET_RLOCK(), instead of using >>> IFNET_WLOCK(). >>> Since IFNET_RLOCK() results into sx_slock(), this should fix the issue. >>> >>> On FreeBSD, this locking is needed to protect a flag read by nm_iszombie(). >>> However, on Linux the same lock is also needed to protect the call to >>> the nm_hw_register() callback, so we prefer to have an "unified" >>> locking scheme, i.e. always calling nm_hw_register under the lock. >>> >>> Does this make sense to you? Would it be easy for you to make a quick >>> test by replacing IFNET_WLOCK with IFNET_RLOCK? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vincenzo >>> >>> 2016-12-17 23:28 GMT+01:00 Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>: >>>> Luigi, Vincenzo, >>>> >>>> The last major update to netmap (r307394 and followups) broke cxgbe's >>>> native netmap support. The problem is that netmap_hw_reg now holds an >>>> rw_lock around the driver's netmap_on/off routines. It has always been >>>> safe for the driver to sleep during these operations but now it panics >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> Why is IFNET_WLOCK needed here? It seems like a regression to disallow >>>> sleep on the control path. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Navdeep >>>> >>>> begin_synchronized_op with the following non-sleepable locks held: >>>> exclusive rw ifnet_rw (ifnet_rw) r = 0 (0xffffffff8271d680) locked @ >>>> /root/ws/head/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_freebsd.c:95 >>>> stack backtrace: >>>> #0 0xffffffff810837a5 at witness_debugger+0xe5 >>>> #1 0xffffffff81084d88 at witness_warn+0x3b8 >>>> #2 0xffffffff83ef2bcc at begin_synchronized_op+0x6c >>>> #3 0xffffffff83f14beb at cxgbe_netmap_reg+0x5b >>>> #4 0xffffffff809846f1 at netmap_hw_reg+0x81 >>>> #5 0xffffffff809806de at netmap_do_regif+0x19e >>>> #6 0xffffffff8098121d at netmap_ioctl+0x7ad >>>> #7 0xffffffff8098682f at freebsd_netmap_ioctl+0x5f >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Vincenzo Maffione >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Vincenzo Maffione > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomPW7%2BknAKbaLYjKXfgd=xAH3bYZi_LoxtNf5cuejJeJw>