From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 24 13:46:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EF616A468 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7513C447 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369201B10EBB for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:46:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.2] (unknown [192.168.25.6]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3206C1B10EB5 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:46:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46559723.6070502@sun-fish.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:46:11 +0300 From: Stefan Lambrev User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <465454CF.3060601@sun-fish.com> <86sl9m8jc0.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86sl9m8jc0.fsf@dwp.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on BLAH Subject: Re: CPUTYPE X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:46:16 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Stefan Lambrev writes: > >> From what I read the right CPUTYPE for freebsd/amd64 and >> >> CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (1995.02-MHz K8-class CPU) >> [...] >> >> I should use CPUTYPE?=nocona , right? >> I just want to be sure :) >> > > On -CURRENT, CPUTYPE?=core2; I haven't MFCed this yet but will soon. > > DES > Yeah I noticed that new current does have core and core2 CPUTYPEs and that they are still aliases to nocona :) But core 2 is supposed to have SSSE3 and I do not have it in my CPU features flags. At least new Xeon processors have this feature. SSSE3 is (will be) the only difference between core2 and nocona right ?