From owner-freebsd-security  Tue May  2 03:57:21 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA01158
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 2 May 1995 03:57:21 -0700
Received: from dtr.com (dtr.rain.com [204.119.8.19])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA01148
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 May 1995 03:56:59 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA00960 for security@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 May 1995 03:46:50 -0700
From: Brant Katkansky <bmk@dtr.com>
Message-Id: <199505021046.DAA00960@dtr.com>
Subject: Security options for NFS?
To: security@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 03:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 116       
Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I'm looking to secure NFS and other services not covered by tcpd -
what's the conventional wisdom for FreeBSD 2.0?