From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  9 01:22:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004D916A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Feb 2004 01:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tele.imt.com.ua (unknown [212.109.43.162])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFA543D1D
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Feb 2004 01:22:06 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from ant@imt.com.ua)
Received: from tele.imt.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tele.imt.com.ua (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i199M3D9033593
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:22:05 +0200 (EET)	(envelope-from ant@imt.com.ua)
Received: from localhost (ant@localhost)i199M3Ua033590
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:22:03 +0200 (EET)	(envelope-from ant@imt.com.ua)
X-Authentication-Warning: tele.imt.com.ua: ant owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:22:03 +0200 (EET)
From: Andriy Tkachuk <ant@imt.com.ua>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040209105800.T33433@tele.imt.com.ua>
Message-ID: <20040209111434.G33433@tele.imt.com.ua>
References: <0FDD52D38220D611B7CC0004763B3744F80826@HNTS-04>
 <20040209105800.T33433@tele.imt.com.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT becomes default to deny
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:22:08 -0000

sorry: i just checked handbook and there is written that there is
two ways: new and traditional.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html

So: you failed in traditional, anyway it's interesting if
there will be the same result with the new way.

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Andriy Tkachuk wrote:

> just for experiment, try:
>
> cd /usr/src
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=<YOUR_KERN_CONF> && make installkernel KERNCONF=<YOUR_KERN_CONF>
>
> > config & make weren't complaining so, installed the kernel, reboot and there
> > it was:
> ...
> > I triple checked the config file for the right settings. And, as I did
> > config && make depend && make install the system
> > wasn't complaing about a thing.
>
> did you ever make clean? anyway this is true: you are using the old style
> of kernel rebuilding. On my mind the new one is more convenient, so I don't
> know why people fight with old one - habit? :)
>
> just do as is written in handbook and then say what is not true in it
>
> regards