From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 14 15:52:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA01549 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA01540; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA06591; Thu, 15 Aug 1996 08:51:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 08:51:50 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Darren Reed cc: Julian Elischer , sos@freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw vs ipfilter? In-Reply-To: <199608142231.PAA00154@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Aug 1996, Darren Reed wrote: > In some mail from Julian Elischer, sie said: > > > > sos@freebsd.org wrote: > > > > > > In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote: > > > > > I'm all for it !! > > > It leaves the question what to do with julian's redirect code ?? > > I've been unwilling to join this conversation, but here I have to ask; > what does "divert" do ? In fact the divert functionality is already in ipfilter. It simply takes a packet and diverts it to a nominated interface (e.g. tun0) rather than allowing it to pass through the normal routing tables. Danny