From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 23 12:53:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA19874 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 12:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caliban.dihelix.com (caliban.dihelix.com [198.180.136.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19865 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 12:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from langfod@localhost) by caliban.dihelix.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) id JAA04857; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:51:36 -1000 (HST) Message-Id: <199704231951.JAA04857@caliban.dihelix.com> Subject: Re: sendmail tricks anyone? In-Reply-To: from Dan Busarow at "Apr 22, 97 06:20:44 pm" To: dan@dpcsys.com (Dan Busarow) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:51:36 -1000 (HST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, khetan@iafrica.com From: "David Langford" X-blank-line: This space intentionaly left blank. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Okay have had the check_rcpt fileters in place for a bit now and I am getting the following from one site: (<[smtp:User@Ourhost.net]>) rejection: 471 Now I know the the smtp: syntax can work but whats up with the [] brackets? Are they badly miscomfigured or what. Should I tweak the ruleset to allow this kind of thing? Thanks, -David Langford langfod@dihelix.com