From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 08:03:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0632F16A4BF; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8F243FDD; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:03:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7TF3AwN069467; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:03:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:03:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030829.090308.108809143.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <200308291035.h7TAZ1Wm008611@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: phk@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/sbin Makefile src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.sbin Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:03:13 -0000 In message: Robert Watson writes: : I was somewhat hopeful that a further outcome might be that Makefiles are : scattered around containing fields like: : : COMPONENT= ACPI : COMPONENT= OPENSSL : : so that individual Makefiles would contain positive assertions about what : they are, meaning that the Makefile infrastructure could later be tweaked : to do installs of only those components... I'm not completely sure that marking things to this level would be completely useful. I went down that path at one point, but to create a bootable system, you need such an eclectic list of things... There should be a better concept of things. We have identified a minimal list of things to have to boot rc files (I haven't redone this for 5) and then the minimal network utilities. I guess I'm saying that packaging is hard and to do simple things is easy, but will lead to a big mess if we aren't careful. Warner