From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 25 20:26:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5816A400 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3250713C442 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.he.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02022359F; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:26:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (silver.he.iki.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0fB25MyaJEB; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:26:22 +0200 (EET) Received: from [193.64.42.234] (dyn234.helenius.fi [193.64.42.234]) by silver.he.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:26:22 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:26:18 +0200 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:26:32 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely > to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good > scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc > locking in CVS. > > Could you give a link to the 7.0-CVS graph? Pete