From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Aug 28 15:59:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA25590
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 15:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homeport.org (lighthouse.homeport.org [205.136.65.198])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA25584
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 15:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (adam@localhost) by homeport.org (8.8.5/8.6.9) id SAA09064; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 18:56:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Message-Id: <199708282256.SAA09064@homeport.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-97:04.procfs
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970828124429.23943A-100000@super-g.inch.com> from spork at "Aug 28, 97 12:44:48 pm"
To: spork@super-g.com (spork)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 18:56:05 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: adam@homeport.org, omar@clifford.inch.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL27 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Right.  Oops. :)

spork wrote:
| He did, check out his message... ;)
| 
| Charles
| 
| On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Adam Shostack wrote:
| 
| > If you search the bugtraq archives, you can find exploit code.  Why
| > not grab some and test for yourself if your systems are vulnerable?
| > 
| > Adam
| > 
| > 
| > Omar Thameen wrote:
| > | What's the official word on whether 2.1.7 is vulnerable?  I know below
| > | says that 2.1.* is, but the previous discussion indicated that it was
| > | not.  I personally haven't gotten the exploit to work, but I may be doing
| > | something wrong.