From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Dec 9 4:35:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1637B405 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 04:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id fB9CZ2763694; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:35:02 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB9CY8U15286; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:34:08 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200112091234.fB9CY8U15286@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: FreeBSD-chat Subject: Re: Alternative to NIS / Hesiod References: In-Reply-To: ; from "Jason C. Wells" "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:57:32 PST." Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:34:08 +0000 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I have been searching for a centralized user database method that can > interoperate with Kerberos. Can any of you recommend a particular method? PAM with Radius or tacacs+? M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message