From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 14:48:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAB51065672 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604C8FC1C for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-security@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Sd0UY-00086D-Ts>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:48:46 +0200 Received: from munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.110]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-security@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Sd0UY-0003h7-RU>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:48:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD210CB.6030000@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:48:43 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." Organization: FU Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120602 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <86r4tqotjo.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.110 Subject: Re: Default password hash X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:48:53 -0000 On 06/08/12 15:06, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> We still have MD5 as our default password hash, even though known-hash >> attacks against MD5 are relatively easy these days. We've supported >> SHA256 and SHA512 for many years now, so how about making SHA512 the >> default instead of MD5, like on most Linux distributions? > > If SHA-2 hashes have been supported for many years, why haven't the > man pages been updated? login.conf(5) on 9.0-RELEASE still only lists > "des", "md5", and "blf". I've been using the latter on my systems. > > - Max > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I asked similar things once: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2009-January/005072.html I use "blf" since then. I hear the first time FreeBSD is supporting SHA256 and SHA512. Oliver