From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 10 9:37: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051CC37B422 for ; Thu, 10 May 2001 09:36:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA65993; Thu, 10 May 2001 18:36:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Ken Menzel" Cc: "Andrew Sherrod" , "Jeff Eckermann" , Subject: Re: Oracle, References: <20010510031456.82964.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com> <005301c0d968$0eda7d40$711663cf@icarz.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 10 May 2001 18:36:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <005301c0d968$0eda7d40$711663cf@icarz.com> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Ken Menzel" writes: > Re: row locking, transactions and "toy", please see this page. > http://netgraft.com/~mbac/research/mysqlmyths.html I've seen it before, thanks. When will people stop quoting this document as conclusive proof that MySQL is a real RDBMS? The only item of interest it mentions is the addition of transaction support in recent versions of MySQL. Everything else in there is either meaningless, irrelevant to the issue, or both. MySQL is still a toy. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message