From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 6 18:21:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089031065670 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B9C8FC12 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so9417651wgb.31 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kI580V2/tXJfLjnzNqgPMRsulygKcVps1xqJen4Iyo8=; b=LurYTUT83M97IahXxLo8tSEquXf//ELBz7JGeRKe4Y1xqMGBenHpkF/4yPgQaX+ZjA O3a91K9/7MAVr0kjGl2HJ76wBNtPu2cfSyy3z6JDv8R1h7/CLn62It4LBuSrzJFFbOqi 0/0dcC3v9Boe/p/YrAfLNHb3C3h+KSZ5pNaZEenQdNNKbLOE1dSoUYX1kO3xEf2jJTby yCgaPtMiz2WIMl8mOhU8qmddeTWKJgsZpQ6d0iH21zG5KZ6HEO0sXmPMzMAIbMmO+K93 X0ywAYKmikzSXEPL/z2n0ifPgQkZbA+yeg67cJp3dTb2S764O5YsSODjOAnyCqUbRpzs 4Eng== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.153.139 with SMTP id f11mr1493004wek.16.1341598869470; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.88.155 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:21:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Michael Ross Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about gmirror priorities X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:21:11 -0000 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Michael Ross wrote: > Hi, > > the manpage says for ``gmirror label'': > > The order of components is important, > because a component's priority is based on its position > (starting from 0 to 255). > > > so I would expect to have different priorities for the components, > yet both are listed with a priority of 0: > I would expect components to have a different priority if I assigned them one. Otherwise I would assume they have the default priority. I don't know if makes it makes any difference for the algo you are running anyways. -- Adam Vande More