From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 11 02:51:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA01849 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 02:51:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA01832 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 02:51:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by cimlogic.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.7) id TAA18520; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 19:33:28 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199806110933.TAA18520@cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: floating point usage within the kernel - howto ? In-Reply-To: <199806110745.JAA22102@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> from Luigi Rizzo at "Jun 11, 98 09:45:30 am" To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it (Luigi Rizzo) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 19:33:27 +1000 (EST) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Luigi Rizzo wrote: > (and, last not least, robotics people tend to have a > lot of money just because their hardware costs so much :) If it is robotics, where is the double redundent safety implemented? Are they actually moving mass around? -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message