From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 18 20:13:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mine.kame.net (kame195.kame.net [203.178.141.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB9537B4EC for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([202.249.11.124]) by mine.kame.net (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id NAA51837; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:26:01 +0900 (JST) To: tsoi@xocah.dhs.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Racoon startup at boot problem In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:29:29 +0900" <20010214172929.A76809@xocah.holywar.net> References: <20010214172929.A76809@xocah.holywar.net> X-Mailer: Cue version 0.6 (010125-0306/sakane) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20010219131622Q.sakane@ydc.co.jp> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:16:22 +0900 From: "Shoichi 'Ne' Sakane" X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 9 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > When one server is rebooted and re-initialized racoon, > they do not communicate at all, (in my opinion) because of mis-match of > SPI on each server's SAD entries. Does the problem happen by using the latest racoon ? We know that there are some problem such a SPI mismatch when the system using automated SA negotiation reboots. The problem when the initiator rebooted was solved the latest racoon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message