From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 5 10:12:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A38537BE0D for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FCEDDBC; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 19:10:13 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200004051649.JAA78992@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200004051344.JAA15337@dean.pc.sas.com> <200004051606.JAA78646@apollo.backplane.com> <20000405123724.A24249@cs.mcgill.ca> <200004051649.JAA78992@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 19:06:08 +0200 To: Matthew Dillon , Mathew Kanner From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Vinum breakage Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 9:49 AM -0700 2000/4/5, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Also, as a general note to everyone, make sure you are building vinum > into the kernel directly and not using it as a kld, just to ensure that > it stays in sync with the kernel. Isn't this in direct conflict with the instructions given for normally using vinum? Is this a temporary change, until we get over some of the current problems, or is this a more permanent change? Out of curiosity, is this your recommendation, or does Greg agree with it? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message