From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 08:24:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 694CC1065670; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:24:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Beech Rintoul Message-ID: <20080319082449.GA47448@FreeBSD.org> References: <200803190656.m2J6u5bJ070157@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080319073221.GA36479@FreeBSD.org> <200803182350.49514.beech@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803182350.49514.beech@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/blockade Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:24:49 -0000 On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:50:44PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Alexey Dokuchaev said: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:56:05AM +0000, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > > beech 2008-03-19 06:56:05 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > games/blockade Makefile > > > Log: > > > - Remove USE_X_PREFIX > > > - Bump portrevision > > > > Apparently the log message does not describe what exactly was > > changed: s/USE_XLIB/USE_XORG/ is not the same as removing of > > USE_X_PREFIX. > > I would suggest that since you seem to have the free time to review > commits that you use it constructively to contribute to the effort: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/X11/Todo I'm not sure why, but do you sound a bit offended? I didn't mean to pick on you. I'm not reviewing every commit, either yours or someone's else. I just thought that combination of dropping USE_X_PREFIX and PORTREVISION bump is kinda weird, and decided to take a look. As a side note, for many years peer review in this project was commonly appreciated by its members. Yet I'm starting to see occasional complaints like yours from time to time. I'm not sure why; did we stop caring for quality of what we commit? You can always review mine, I'd just be grateful. ./danfe P.S. I'm still awaiting answers for couple of my emails, BTW. :-)