From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 23:13:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B93106566B for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (adsl-75-1-14-242.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [75.1.14.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341D88FC12 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o7RN1ihT015533; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:01:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201008272301.o7RN1ihT015533@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:01:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: ronald-freebsd8@thuis.klop.ws In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, avg@icyb.net.ua Subject: Re: cname replace in mail address? [off-topic] (Re: Attn Ronald Klop) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:13:34 -0000 On 27 Aug, Ronald Klop wrote: > Mandatory? I'm googling, but can't find a document that declares it > mandatory and only sendmail seems to do it. > I think it is lame to use DNS info to rewrite e-mail addresses, but the > person who made it 'mandatory' will have good reasons for it. > > Does somebody have a pointer to the specs about this? 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1 The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not nicknames or domain abbreviations. A canonicalized name either identifies a host directly or is an MX name; it cannot be a CNAME.