From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Jun 5 17:48:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A445332C8D; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49dqql2mDxz4PdJ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 48D212F4C; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:48:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: Emmanuel Vadot , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r538032 - head/graphics/mesa-dri Message-ID: <20200605174803.GA93715@FreeBSD.org> References: <202006051618.055GIwUd009991@repo.freebsd.org> <20200605165501.GC2013@KGPE-D16> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200605165501.GC2013@KGPE-D16> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:48:03 -0000 On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:55:01PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > Please don't do that. GCC architectures (11 and 12) use only ld.bfd. > You just broke all of them. Seeing all this mesa ports fallout (just looking at the number of PRs closed as duplicates of 246997) I'm starting to wonder whether that switch to meson was poorly tested and should be just backed out. Looks like it made quite a few people rather unhappy. ./danfe