From owner-freebsd-java Sun Jan 24 12:41:26 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA15918 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:41:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA15913 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:41:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA03675; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:41:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA01895; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:41:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:41:12 -0700 Message-Id: <199901242041.NAA01895@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Amancio Hasty Cc: Nate Williams , java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TowerJ for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199901242037.MAA03137@rah.star-gate.com> References: <199901242010.NAA01802@mt.sri.com> <199901242037.MAA03137@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html > > Any clues as why NT's VM is so fast? Because M$'s JIT actually works well most of the time, unlike the Symantec one (which Sun bundles for free with the Win32 JDK/JRE). And, the Linux JIT's aren't 'state-of-the-art' or supported, so there isn't much incentive to make them faster. > I will keep digging for the linux / nt servlet comparison. Thanks, I'd like to read it. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message