From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Feb 25 15:04:47 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA07591 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 15:04:47 -0800
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA07578; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 15:04:41 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id QAA14897; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 16:07:31 -0700
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 1995 16:07:31 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199502252307.QAA14897@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
       "Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD" (Feb 25,  1:36pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>, terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD
Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, ernie@tinny.eis.net.au,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I have a patch here on my machine from Nate to sync us to NetBSD shlibs.

Sort of.  This syncs us up so we're using the same ld/ld.so and friends.
However, our libraries are different from theirs, so even though the
libraries are 'binary compatible' the code inside the libraries are not.


Nate