From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 8 07:41:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA21686 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 07:41:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net [206.64.4.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA21681 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 07:41:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA21232; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:44:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:44:24 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net To: "David E. Cross" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: O_SYNC In-Reply-To: <199811072154.QAA00324@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, however every other OS defines it at "O_SYNC" why are we different? or, if there is a reason, why isn't there a compatibility #define? can someone check this on netbsd/open bsd/os ? is it bsd or us? Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, David E. Cross wrote: > Is 'O_FSYNC" what you are looking for? > > #define O_FSYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > > > -- > David Cross > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message