From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 22 05:43:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4323E16A4CE; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 05:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.zvezda.number.ru (unknown [213.247.150.169])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0792E43D1D; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 05:43:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from blacksir@number.ru)
Received: from host212-5-99-220.izmaylovo.ru ([212.5.99.220] helo=blacksir)
	by mail.zvezda.number.ru with smtp (Exim)
	id 1AuttZ-000IBn-Px; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:43:45 +0300
From: "Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir" <blacksir@number.ru>
To: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@cell.sick.ru>,
	"Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:43:40 +0300
Message-ID: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20040221235815.GA62385@cell.sick.ru>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
	"inet.zvezda.number.ru", hasmessageblock
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who
	thought just a week ago that netgraph is something beetween net &
	graphics... like MRTG LOL Another question: Is is possible that
	apologise,
	that this would require divert implemented as netgraph node? So... I
	[...] 	Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	--------------------------------------------------
	-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: ng_netflow: testers are welcome
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:43:52 -0000

Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago
that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG
LOL

Another question:
Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by
natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph
node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any
ideas?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:58 AM
> To: Julian Elischer
> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Bjoern A. Zeeb; Vasenin Alexander aka
> BlackSir; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome

> Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module
> shipped with base system? How?
> For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is obvious
> that ipfw is required for it, as well as in case of netgraph
> and ng_netflow.