From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 24 09:50:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C517CFA0; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from butcher-nb.yandex.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB9084F; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <530B15F1.5050300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:50:41 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Rodrigues , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: svn commit: r262351 - head/sys/netinet6 References: <201402230127.s1N1RMoX052542@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:50:56 -0000 On 24.02.2014 12:34, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2014 2:56 PM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" > wrote: >> >> >> On 23 Feb 2014, at 01:27 , Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> >> > Author: rodrigc >> > Date: Sun Feb 23 01:27:22 2014 >> > New Revision: 262351 >> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/262351 >> > >> > Log: >> > Remove KASSERT from in6p_lookup_mcast_ifp(). >> > >> > When the devel/jenkins port, version 1.551 was started, >> > the kernel would panic if INVARIANTS was enabled in the kernel config. >> > >> > Suggested by: bms >> >> This reads to me “we hit the assert, bms suggested to remove it”. > Great! Caught a bug! Where is it? In no way the commit message tells > me why? Why did we not hit the assert in the last n years? What has > changed that we hit it now? Was the assert wrong from the beginning? > Did we hit a real bug elsewhere and now lost the tracking for it? >> >> Could you please at least for the archives explain? > > Bruce suggested that I remove the KASSERT here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-October/036806.html There was my analysis: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-August/036545.html I think it is safe to remove this KASSERT. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov