From owner-cvs-usrbin Sat Mar 1 04:57:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA04087 for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 04:57:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA04071; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 04:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.5/8.8.2) id NAA18763; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 13:56:13 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199703011256.NAA18763@gvr.win.tue.nl> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c In-Reply-To: from Burton Sampley at "Feb 25, 97 03:33:33 pm" To: burton@bsampley.vip.best.com (Burton Sampley) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 13:56:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, ache@nagual.ru, guido@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Burton Sampley wrote: > > I have to take a minute to through in my 2 cents here. After working in > the EDP Audit Department for a major bank in the US, the thought of a co. > not knowing who has access to root privs is a little frightening. What's > the co.'s reasoning for this kind of setup? I would hope it's *NOT* a > mission critical, production box. > It isn't. Further, you should notice that with the default setup that FreeBSD ships with, only root is allowed to su. So you explicitly have to enable this `feature'. -Guido