From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 26 21:21:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB5A37BE01 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:21:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from galt@inconnu.isu.edu) Received: from localhost (galt@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20939; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:21:12 -0600 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:21:12 -0600 (MDT) From: John Galt To: Ben Smithurst Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , CLE47@aol.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip question In-Reply-To: <20000627025025.I57917@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I stand corrected, I just found out about the nslookup deprecation last week and started to get familiar with it Saturday... On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > John Galt wrote: > > > Use dig--they're talking about deprecating nslookup in bind 9... so it'll > > be: > > > > dig @63.8.31.60 > > No, it won't. @foo specifies that dig should use foo as the nameserver. I > think you'd need > > dig -x 63.8.31.60 ptr > > The only thing which annoys me about dig is that you don't do "dig > foo" where "foo" is a local name, you must explicitly say "dig > foo.my.domain.whatever.com". Oh well. > > -- Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer: "My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that." Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message