From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 11 13:45:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351AB15153 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:45:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01120 for Stable@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:45:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <199909112045.NAA01120@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: clock syncronization To: Stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:45:56 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a follow-up to my own question, which was (approximately) "what (if any) is the syncronization between the kernel's idea of the time, and the CMOS clock on the motherboard". The answer may be found via "man adjkerntz". -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message