From owner-cvs-all  Wed Jun 30 16:40:18 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F2D2C154BC; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com)
Received: (from rgrimes@localhost)
	by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA12925;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rgrimes)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Message-Id: <199906302339.QAA12925@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services
In-Reply-To: <19990701003127.B26123@pavilion.net> from Josef Karthauser at "Jul 1, 1999 00:31:27 am"
To: joe@pavilion.net (Josef Karthauser)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), Doug@gorean.org (Doug),
	jkh@FreeBSD.org (Jordan K. Hubbard), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

...
> 
> Come on guys... why the discussion now?  The change was
> made in Feb.  If there were problems they should have been
          ^^^  Look again, May 23, 1998, 13 months ago!

> mentioned _then_.  Leave them on the RFC ports (1812 & 1813).
> [We changed over to the 18xx numbers on our dial network and
> firewalls last October]
> 
...
> 	-------------------------------------------
> 
> 	1.48 Sat May 23 7:52:17 1998 UTC by phk 
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 	RADIUS was originally coded to use ports 1645 (radius) and
> 	1646 (radacct), but RFC's 2138 and 2139 define new ports
> 	for RADIUS and RADIUS accounting, namely 1812 and 1813
> 	respectively.  FreeBSD 2.2.6 uses the old radacct port, but
> 	the new radius port, which is a bit silly.
> 
> 	-------------------------------------------
> 
> 	1.57 Wed Jun 30 6:11:14 1999 UTC by jkh 
> 
> 	Put radius on its proper ports.

Now I demand an immediate revert on the commit, and retract any proposal
for commenting them out.  It has been OVER A YEAR since phk changed these,

> > I could certainly live with (and even enthusiastically support) such a
> > compromise.  Perhaps the 1812/1813 entries still in there but
> > commented out with a notation as to why, along with uncommented
> > 1645/1646 entries which also point to the other entries as the
> > "official but not often used" ones?  Would that make you and Rod
> > happy? :-)
> 
> It wouldn't make me happy!   :)

So, Jordan, just because it took you a year to run into this, it looks like
several of the ISP's have already migrated, and you just de-migrated them :-(.

About the only thing I could live with at this point is a comment around 
the 1645/1646 entries, but 1812 goes in as active just the way it has been
for over a year.


-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25)                    rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message