From owner-cvs-all Tue May 22 16:39:15 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B0F37B424; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:39:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from spike.unixfreak.org (spike [63.198.170.139]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1013E2C; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:39:11 -0700 (PDT) To: Josef Karthauser Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT cfg.pm In-Reply-To: <200105222318.f4MNIBQ19347@freefall.freebsd.org>; from joe@FreeBSD.org on "Tue, 22 May 2001 16:18:11 -0700 (PDT)" Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:39:11 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010522233911.4E1013E2C@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Josef Karthauser writes: > joe 2001/05/22 16:18:11 PDT > > Modified files: > . cfg.pm > Log: > Revert to the previous behaviour of not sending mail on directory > creation. > > Note to FreeBSD committers: do we want this on? I don't think it's a very good idea. Think of ports. People already don't like that there are two commits for every new port (the port itself and CVSROOT/modules); this would raise that number to three or four (the dir(s) for the port, the port, and modules). Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org > > Revision Changes Path > 1.9 +2 -2 CVSROOT/cfg.pm > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message