From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 19 12:12:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D837B409; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:12:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from wonky.feral.com (mjacob@wonky.feral.com [192.67.166.7]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6JJCOS67364; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:12:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:12:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: Sudish Joseph Cc: John Baldwin , Terry Lambert , , Subject: Re: x86 unaligned access followup. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010719121156.J50024-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cool. Thanks. I'll rip it out of modules builds for alpha then- it'll save some time in kernel rebuilds. On 19 Jul 2001, Sudish Joseph wrote: > Matthew Jacob writes: > > Actually, to be fair, we'd have to consider all the kernel subsystems that > > have *not* in fact been tested on alpha. The dozens of warnings from NetGraph > > or CODA code indicate that there might be problems there, for instance. > > NetGraph certainly has some 32-bit asssumptions embedded in it that > actively break on an Alpha. See kern/27767. > > -- > Sudish Joseph > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message