From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 14 12:48:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC511065697; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [62.119.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB118FC1B; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vnode.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D682BE3F07A; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:32:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vnode.se Received: from mail.vnode.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MvX5hiRit4uM; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:32:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto.vnode.local (unknown [83.223.1.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B828E3F079; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:32:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:32:15 +0200 From: Joel Dahl To: "Sam Fourman Jr." Message-ID: <20100814123215.GA1207@pluto.vnode.local> References: <4C6505A4.9060203@FreeBSD.org> <20100813085235.GA16268@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Doug Barton , current@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , core@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:48:55 -0000 On 14-08-2010 4:35, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > >> BSD grep > >> Elapsed time: 47 seconds > > > > what about optimizing BSD grep instead? > > I think this is reasonable, leave BSD grep default for a few more weeks, and > work on performance enhancements. I agree that changing the default back > for a RELEASE is probably a good idea, but the exposure to wider testing > while focusing on performance, can't hurt much can it? I agree, keep bsdgrep as default for a while and focus on the performance problems. This is CURRENT after all, and 9.0 isn't anywhere near release yet (afaik). -- Joel