From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 08:31:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2DD16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:31:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bigass1.bitblock.com (ns1.bitblock.com [66.199.170.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56843D39 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:31:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@bitblock.com) Received: from a1200 ([70.69.125.122]) (AUTH: LOGIN mitch@bitblock.com) by bigass1.bitblock.com with esmtp; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:31:31 +0000 X-Abuse-Reports: Visit http://www.bitblock.com/abuse.php X-Abuse-Reports: and submit a copy of the message headers X-Abuse-Reports: or review our policies and procedures X-Abuse-Reports: ID= 412D9FE3.000099CA.bigass1.bitblock.com,dns; a1200 ([70.69.125.122]),AUTH: LOGIN mitch@bitblock.com From: "Mitch (bitblock)" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:31:30 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Performance RAID setup... X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:31:34 -0000 Seeking opinions / satisfaction indicators... I'm looking at a new storage server to be part of a quasi SAN (some home grown bits and pieces will run on it)... The platform we are considering is the INTEL SE7501WV2 SCSI MOTHERBOARD with INTEL SRCU42L RAID CONTROLLER with Dual Xeon processors and a chunk of RAM of course ;-) One floating consideration is the hard drive configuration and the relative performance. I could go with 6 73GB 15000 RPM drives in two RAID 5 sets, or I could go with 6 146GB 10000RPM drives in RAID mirrors. The goal is to provide a NFS / SAMBA server for 4 - 20 application servers. Anyone have any value for dollar comments? Suggestions or stats on what will run better? MUCH appreciated. Mitch.