From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 7 06:13:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704ACD41 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 06:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Received: from smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (smtp-sofia.digsys.bg [193.68.21.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E86402954 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 06:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dcave.digsys.bg (dcave.digsys.bg [193.68.6.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r776DSJY087201 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:13:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Message-ID: <5201E588.5040604@digsys.bg> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:13:28 +0300 From: Daniel Kalchev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130731 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn error during 'make buildkernel'? References: <20130803210348.GA715@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130803210858.GJ78299@glenbarber.us> <20130803213023.GA812@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130803214313.GL78299@glenbarber.us> <20130804232358.GA6068@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130805004433.GA6355@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130805005530.GL2352@glenbarber.us> <20130806181107.GR34979@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20130806181107.GR34979@over-yonder.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:13:39 -0000 On 06.08.13 21:11, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > Sure, right _now_ devel/subversion and base svnlite get along, but > what happens when ports moves to 1.9 which changes the WT format? This is just one of the quirks that subversion has, in that it's database can't be easily parsed with other tools. Perhaps a "fix" might be caching the last revision number in a text file so you don't need svnversion in order to extract it from the source tree? A fix/patch to subversion, that is. Daniel