From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 07:57:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38D2F54 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A851479 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE70730D; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 34C32361; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:57:16 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Jilles Tjoelker Subject: Re: rc.conf.d improvement References: <86a97bp27r.fsf@nine.des.no> <20140905195912.GC73176@stack.nl> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:57:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140905195912.GC73176@stack.nl> (Jilles Tjoelker's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:59:12 +0200") Message-ID: <861trm7des.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 07:57:31 -0000 Jilles Tjoelker writes: > Conceptually it is ok, but I have a comment about the implementation > of 2). See r270392 DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no