From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 27 10:41:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from carbon.btinternet.com (carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA9150C6 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:40:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jsp@pendry.com) Received: from [195.99.51.200] (helo=pendry.com) by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 10yIua-0004Uj-00; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:40:13 +0100 Message-ID: <377661C6.89FB7F5@pendry.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:39:18 +0100 From: Jan-Simon Pendry X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.3.2 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Viro Cc: Bill Sommerfeld , Francois-Rene Rideau , Linux Kernel , FreeBSD Hackers , NetBSD Kernel Subject: Re: Improving the Unix API References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Viro wrote: > Proposed API on the Linux side being > int chflags(name, level, oldp, newp); where level is FL_VFS for generic > attirbutes (fs may map them on its own set) and FL_{UFS,EXT2,...} for raw > flags - corresponding filesystem is free to interpret the thing as it > likes and should set the generic attributes in the right way. if linux introduces a different API (ie not just an extension of the existing bsd API) then please do *not* call it "chflags". it took years just to get over the bsd vs. svr4 gettimeofday() fiasco. btw, what's the proposed API for getting the current attribute set? jan-simon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message