From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Oct 12 20:04:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA09785
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from iris (iris.physics.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.36.47])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA09721
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from kkennawa@iris)
Received: by iris; id AA02213; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:30:28 +0930
From: Kristian Kennaway <kkennawa@iris>
Message-Id: <9710130300.AA02213@iris>
Subject: Re: Ghostscript 5 port is broken
To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:30:28 +0930 (CST)
Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, mike@smith.net.au, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19971013093408.48473@lemis.com> from "Greg Lehey" at Oct 13, 97 09:34:08 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > You need a new bsd.port.mk for both these things.
> 
> Don't I get that with a 'make world'?  I have:
> 
> $ l /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk
> -r--r--r--  1 bin  bin  54241 Oct  9 04:15 /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk
> 
> I've built ghostscript 5 twice in the last couple of weeks on a
> -current less than 7 days old, and I can confirm both these points.
> In addition, a couple of other points:

Confirmed here as well with similar circumstances - and on 2.2-stable as 
well.

Kris