From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 19:18:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5730816A4CE for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:18:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (fed1rmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.241.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226A543D45 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:18:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040918191740.AJQ6669.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:17:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:17:50 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" To: vova@fbsd.ru References: <1095531898.1012.16.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1095531898.1012.16.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 751) cc: gnome Subject: Re: Is GNOME 2.7/2.8 stable to you? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:18:04 -0000 On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:24:58 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > В пн, 13/09/2004 в 22:02 -0500, Jeremy Messenger пишет: >> Hello folks, >> >> I haven't seen many report of GNOME 2.7/2.8 for weeks/months, so I am >> wondering how does it goes with all of you? I think, this 2.7 >> development >> is the most stable version that I have tested, which I couldn't find any >> more bugs lately beside gstreamer. I tried to use it as normal Windows >> user such as avoid the CLI and done all in GUI while I don't have any >> access to CVS, seems like everything work very well. The gstreamer is >> only >> an app that is annoying to me, which it isn't that stable when I run the >> nautilus in my movies directory. >> >> If one of you find the bugs, then go ahead reply to this thread. I want >> to >> see those reports, because the final is coming soon. > > Firefox does not install gnome menu item. Seems not good for me. Uh? Firefox != GNOME... I am asking for _GNOME_'s stability; not ask for missing kid icon of third party apps. If Firefox doesn't know how to install icons by the 'make install' or don't have any *.desktop, then blame that on the Firefox developers (aka, they have bugzilla). There are many apps that don't install or don't have icons by default. >> Cheers, >> Mezz -- mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org