Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:17:50 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: vova@fbsd.ru Cc: gnome <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is GNOME 2.7/2.8 stable to you? Message-ID: <opsejej0i29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <1095531898.1012.16.camel@localhost> References: <opseaqp2nq9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1095531898.1012.16.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:24:58 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru> wrote: > В пн, 13/09/2004 в 22:02 -0500, Jeremy Messenger пишет: >> Hello folks, >> >> I haven't seen many report of GNOME 2.7/2.8 for weeks/months, so I am >> wondering how does it goes with all of you? I think, this 2.7 >> development >> is the most stable version that I have tested, which I couldn't find any >> more bugs lately beside gstreamer. I tried to use it as normal Windows >> user such as avoid the CLI and done all in GUI while I don't have any >> access to CVS, seems like everything work very well. The gstreamer is >> only >> an app that is annoying to me, which it isn't that stable when I run the >> nautilus in my movies directory. >> >> If one of you find the bugs, then go ahead reply to this thread. I want >> to >> see those reports, because the final is coming soon. > > Firefox does not install gnome menu item. Seems not good for me. Uh? Firefox != GNOME... I am asking for _GNOME_'s stability; not ask for missing kid icon of third party apps. If Firefox doesn't know how to install icons by the 'make install' or don't have any *.desktop, then blame that on the Firefox developers (aka, they have bugzilla). There are many apps that don't install or don't have icons by default. >> Cheers, >> Mezz -- mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opsejej0i29aq2h7>