From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 1 15:25:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57536106568F for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279F78FC1C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7DB446B3B; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 094DF8A03E; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:25:11 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Nick Hilliard Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:23:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4A9BF23F.6070801@netability.ie> <200909011002.59592.jhb@freebsd.org> <4A9D3030.9040500@netability.ie> In-Reply-To: <4A9D3030.9040500@netability.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909011123.04873.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:25:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-beta3 does not detect several ata channels X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:25:12 -0000 On Tuesday 01 September 2009 10:31:12 am Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 01/09/2009 15:02, John Baldwin wrote: > > Hmm, so an idea I had just now.. can you grab a dump of the PCI config space > > for the disk controller in the MCFG vs non-MCFG cases? That is, find the > > device's address using pciconf -lv (e.g. pci0:0:30:0 or some such) and then > > run this command under both configurations and save the output: > > > > pciconf -r pci0:0:30:0 0:0xfc > > 7.1, 8.0-beta3, or does it matter? Doesn't really matter, I just want to compare a working case to a non-working case. -- John Baldwin