From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 11 17:44: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB26037B402 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0C1hjc03519; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:43:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:43:45 -0800 From: "'Alfred Perlstein'" To: Glen Gross Cc: Carl Makin , "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Running Linux kernel modules. Message-ID: <20010111174345.R7240@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <01C07BF3.695D3780.ggross@symark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01C07BF3.695D3780.ggross@symark.com>; from ggross@symark.com on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 05:24:52PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Glen Gross [010111 17:23] wrote: > Is there a possibility of a generalized interface where any linux kernel module > could be loaded, in the event that the linux emulator were loaded? Or would > this require running the linux kernel in RAM, and therefore running two virtual > machines? please wrap lines at 70 characters. No, the kernel internal structures are pretty different, this would require quite a feat of abstraction to accomplish. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message