Date: 12 Jun 1996 14:18:29 -0400 From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adaptec disk controllers and 2.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <4pn1ll$cu0@twwells.com> References: <4pl201$rov@twwells.com> <199606121218.FAA00971@Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199606121218.FAA00971@Root.COM>, David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> wrote: : -stable is not a release. I know that. I was referring to the various snapshots. : a recent snapshot of -stable, but it doesn't have the latest aha2940 fixes. : When I said "upgrade to -stable", I meant using SUP to update your source tree : to the current -stable sources. There's a leetle problem with this. The machine is question is a production machine and the last thing I need is to make it go unstable by installing whatever happens to be the latest source. I'm sticking to releases and snapshots and then only if I don't hear of significant problems. >From what you're saying, it looks like what I need to do is get the latest snapshot _and_ the latest stable and retrofit the necessary changes. So, before I go to this pain, is it reasonable to attempt this? Should it fix my problems?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4pn1ll$cu0>